Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 139(1): 3-8, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1493990

ABSTRACT

Three coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been authorized for use in the United States; specifically, the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson-Janssen COVID-19 vaccines were granted emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late 2020 and early 2021. Vaccination coverage and intent among adults are lowest among those aged 18-39 years and among females in particular. In females of reproductive age, enthusiasm for receiving a COVID-19 vaccine may be negatively affected by claims currently circulating widely on diverse social media platforms regarding the vaccines adversely affecting fertility and pregnancy. Yet it is important to note that these claims are anecdotal in nature and not supported by the available scientific evidence. It is also imperative that the effects of COVID-19 vaccine on reproductive health are clarified. Herein, we discuss the existing scientific data supporting COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy in people who are planning to conceive or who are pregnant or lactating and highlight the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in females of reproductive age.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Preconception Care , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Prenatal Care , Puerperal Infection/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccine Efficacy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Lactation , Pregnancy , Young Adult
3.
Fertil Steril ; 114(6): 1242-1249, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-785586

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate, with pre-COVID-19 data, whether parental exposure to severe systemic infections near the time of conception is associated with pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based study covering births within the United States from 2009 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS: The IBM MarketScan Research database covers reimbursed health care claims data on inpatient and outpatient encounters that are privately insured through employment-sponsored health insurance. Our analytic sample included pregnancies to paired fathers and mothers. INTERVENTIONS(S): Parental preconception exposure (0-6 months before conception) to severe systemic infection (e.g., sepsis, hypotension, respiratory failure, critical care evaluation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preterm birth (i.e., live birth before 37 weeks) and pregnancy loss. RESULT(S): A total of 999,866 pregnancies were recorded with 214,057 pregnancy losses (21.4%) and 51,759 preterm births (5.2%). Mothers receiving intensive care in the preconception period had increased risk of pregnancy loss, as did fathers. Mothers with preconception sepsis had higher risk of preterm birth and pregnancy loss, and paternal sepsis exposure was associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss. Similar results were noted for hypotension. In addition, a dose response was observed for both mothers and fathers between preconception time in intensive care and the risk of preterm birth and pregnancy loss. CONCLUSION(S): In a pre-COVID-19 cohort, parental preconception severe systemic infection was associated with increased odds of preterm birth and pregnancy loss when conception was soon after the illness.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Parents , Pregnancy Outcome , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Critical Care , Fathers , Female , Fertilization , Humans , Male , Mothers , Preconception Care , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 59(6): 808-811, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-752809

ABSTRACT

Many routine and elective services have already been postponed or suspended by both Government and private setups in most parts of the world because of the unprecedented pandemic of COVID-19. Healthcare systems everywhere in the world are under pressure. Being a component of essential health services, family planning and abortion services should continue to cater the population in order to prevent the complications arising from unintended pregnancies and sudden rise in STIs. Due to airborne nature of transmission of the virus, it is advisable for all consultations relating to family planning services to be done remotely unless and until visit is absolutely necessary. Contraception initiation and continuation can be done by telemedicine in most individuals. Post partum contraception can be advised before discharge from hospital. In an individual planning for pregnancy, currently it is not advisable to discontinue contraceptive and plan for pregnancy as not much is known about the effect of the virus on foetal development. Also, pregnancy requires routine antenatal and peripartum care and complications arising from pregnancy may necessitate frequent hospital visits, exposing the individual to the risk of infection. Abortion services are time sensitive therefore should not be denied or delayed beyond legal limit. We need to change from real to virtual consultation to prevent the rise in unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections and unsafe abortions.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Family Planning Services/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Telemedicine/methods , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Contraception/methods , Female , Humans , Preconception Care/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Mult Scler ; 26(10): 1137-1146, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-727247

ABSTRACT

Concerns regarding infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 leading to COVID-19 are particularly marked for pregnant women with autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS). There is currently a relative paucity of information to guide advice given to and the clinical management of these individuals. Much of the limited available data around COVID-19 and pregnancy derives from the obstetric literature, and as such, neurologists may not be familiar with the general principles underlying current advice. In this article, we discuss the impact of potential infection on the pregnant woman, the impact on her baby, the impact of the current pandemic on antenatal care, and the interaction between COVID-19, MS and pregnancy. This review provides a framework for neurologists to use to guide the individualised advice given to both pregnant women with MS, and those women with MS who are considering pregnancy. This includes evidence derived from previous novel coronavirus infections, and emerging evidence from the current pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus , Breast Feeding , COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Delivery, Obstetric , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/immunology , Pandemics , Preconception Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/immunology , Premature Birth , Prenatal Care , Recurrence , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL